Logan Paul’s Prime Hydration Files Defamation Lawsuit Against Ryan Garcia

Logan Paul’s Prime Hydration has taken legal action against boxer Ryan Garcia, accusing him of spreading false narratives that have damaged the company’s reputation. According to a lawsuit obtained by TMZ Sports, Garcia has been making statements on social media claiming that Prime Hydration can have harmful effects on consumers, such as damaging their brains and livers. The lawsuit also alleges that Garcia falsely linked Prime to a banned substance called “ostarine,” for which he had tested positive in the past.

Prime Hydration contends that Garcia’s allegations are not only false but also malicious, suggesting that the company is connected to criminal activities such as rape and child abuse. The lawsuit argues that Garcia is fully aware of the baselessness of his claims but continues to spread them in order to boost his own brand and generate controversy. Prime Hydration claims that these actions have directly harmed its business and reputation in the market.

In response to Garcia’s defamation, Prime Hydration has filed a lawsuit against him, citing charges of defamation, trade libel, violations of the Lanham Act, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment. The company is seeking accountability from individuals like Garcia who use false information to tarnish the reputation of Prime Hydration and its associated athletes. With celebrities like Patrick Mahomes, Terence Crawford, and sports teams like the Los Angeles Dodgers and Lakers endorsing Prime Hydration, the company has quickly risen to prominence in the beverage industry.

As of now, Ryan Garcia has not publicly addressed the allegations made by Prime Hydration in the lawsuit. However, it is expected that he will issue a response soon. Given the severity of the accusations against him, Garcia will likely need to provide evidence to support his claims against Prime Hydration or face legal repercussions for his actions. The outcome of this legal battle could have far-reaching consequences for both parties involved and set a precedent for how defamation cases are handled in the future.