“Oppenheimer” may have raked in nearly $1 billion and secured the title of Best Picture, but that doesn’t exempt it from criticism, especially from those who have suffered the consequences of the atomic testing depicted in the film. Despite the acclaim it has received, there are lingering concerns that the movie fails to address the long-term effects of radiation exposure on the real-life people affected by the July 1945 nuclear bomb test in New Mexico.
In the aftermath of the Oscars, some individuals, like Wesley Burris, are willing to forgive the filmmakers for the oversights in the movie but emphasize that it’s crucial not to forget the actual human impact of the events portrayed. Wesley, a victim of the nuclear testing, acknowledges that the cast and crew may not have been aware of the full extent of the harm caused to residents, starting almost 80 years ago. Reflecting on his own experience as a five-year-old at the time of the detonation, Wesley recounts the devastating health consequences his family has endured, including various forms of cancer and leukemia.
The movie may have been captivating and well-made, but it falls short in shedding light on the true aftermath of the nuclear testing. The toxic debris resulting from the bomb test contaminated the environment, water sources, and food chain, exposing New Mexico residents to harmful radiation without their knowledge or consent. Wesley’s account of the lack of information provided to the affected communities underscores the government’s negligence in fully informing the public about the risks involved in the nuclear testing.
Tina Cordova, co-founder of the Tularosa Basin Downwinders Consortium, offers a critical perspective on the movie and its portrayal of the nuclear testing fallout. Living just 15 miles away from the blast site, Tina’s family, like many others in New Mexico, continues to suffer from the health effects of the radiation exposure. She highlights the intentional omission of the literal and figurative fallout in the film, mirroring the exclusion of New Mexico residents from the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act of 1990, which compensated individuals living near nuclear testing sites in other states.
While “Oppenheimer” is celebrated for its artistic achievements, Wesley and Tina, along with countless others in New Mexico, are still waiting for acknowledgment from the U.S. government regarding their struggles and the ongoing health challenges they face. The movie’s success should not overshadow the real-life consequences of the events it portrays, and it is essential to recognize and address the long-term impacts on the communities affected by the nuclear testing.
“Oppenheimer” may have clinched the prestigious title of Best Picture, but it also serves as a reminder of the importance of acknowledging and learning from history’s darker chapters. The film’s success should not overshadow the real experiences of those impacted by the events it depicts, and it is crucial to ensure that their stories are heard and recognized. As the debate around the movie continues, it is essential to keep the focus on the human cost of the nuclear testing and work towards a more comprehensive understanding of the repercussions of such catastrophic events.
Leave a Reply